CO129-028 - Bonham - 1849 [1-3] — Page 49

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Enclosure. No 5,

although not immediately connected with the proceeding against Mr Tarrant, will show that he had made himself very conspicuous in the matter out of which the intended prosecution arose, and to use Mr. Parker's words, - "to take great interest" in the affair, did Mr. Tarrant, as it would appear, and his Servant Shelley Garner - their object appearing to be to oust the then Market Holder "Altai", and to substitute "Wei - A form" "the Co-defendant Mr Ferrant. But should it be maintained that Mr Tarrant in using the expressions attributed to him meant them to have references to Major Faine's Comprador alone, how is it that he did not give that explanation at the time the question was first brought up for investigation at the Police Office? Mr Tarrant in his subsequent letters to the local Government and to Your Lordship, declares that he had not the remotest idea of insinuating that he believed that any extortions were made with the knowledge of Major Faine; and he had only declined to explain himself when the Investigation took place, there is no doubt that the matter would have then dropped, but this he appears to have declined

Edit History

2026-05-17 08:59:09 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Enclosure. No 5, although not immediately connected with the proceeding against Mr Tarrant, will show that he had made himself very conspicuous in the matter out of which the intended prosecution arose, and to use Mr. Parker's words, - "to take great interest" in the affair, did Mr. Tarrant, as it would appear, and his Servant Shelley Garner - their object appearing to be to oust the then Market Holder "Altai", and to substitute "Wei - A form" "the Co-defendant Mr Ferrant. But should it be maintained that Mr Tarrant in using the expressions attributed to him meant them to have references to Major Faine's Comprador alone, how is it that he did not give that explanation at the time the question was first brought up for investigation at the Police Office? Mr Tarrant in his subsequent letters to the local Government and to Your Lordship, declares that he had not the remotest idea of insinuating that he believed that any extortions were made with the knowledge of Major Faine; and he had only declined to explain himself when the Investigation took place, there is no doubt that the matter would have then dropped, but this he appears to have declined
Baseline (Original)
12.- Enclosure. No 5, although not immediate viately connected with the Porendingt against Mr Tarrant, will show that he had made himself very conspicuous in the...... of which the Inatter out intended prosecution arose, and Mr Parker's words, - to use " to take great interest" in the affair, did Mr. The as it would appear and his Servant Shelley Garner - their object appearing to be to oust the then Market Holder Altai", and to substitute "Wei - A form" "the Co-defendant Mr Ferrant. But should it be maintained that Mr of Tarrant in using the expressions attributed to him meant them to have references to Major No5. give, 477 faine's Comprador alone, how is . it that he did not that explanation at the time first brought the question was up for investigation at the Police Office? Mr Tarrant in his subsequent letters to the local Government and to Your Lordship, declares that he had not the remotest idea of insinuating that he believed that extortions any! were Anade with the knowledge of Major (aine; and he had only if seen fit so to express himself. when the Investigation took place, there is no double- that the matter would have then dropped, but this he appears to have declined
2026-05-17 08:59:09 · Baseline
View content

12.-

Enclosure. No 5,

although not immediate

viately connected with the Porendingt against Mr Tarrant, will show that he had made himself very conspicuous in the......

of which the

Inatter

out

intended prosecution arose, and

Mr Parker's words, -

to use

" to take great interest" in

the affair, did Mr. The

as it would appear and his Servant

Shelley

Garner - their object appearing

to be

to oust the then Market Holder Altai", and to substitute "Wei - A form" "the Co-defendant Mr Ferrant. But should it be maintained that Mr

of

Tarrant in using the expressions

attributed to him meant them to have references to Major

No5.

give,

477

faine's Comprador alone, how is . it that he did not that explanation at the time

first brought

the question was up for investigation at the Police Office? Mr Tarrant in his subsequent letters to the local Government and to Your Lordship, declares that he had not the remotest idea of insinuating that he believed that

extortions

any!

were Anade with

the knowledge of Major (aine; and

he had only

if

seen fit so to express himself. when the Investigation took place, there is no double-

that the matter would

have then dropped, but this he appears to have declined

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.